[virt-tools-list] virt-install 0.400-3: cannot install
Cole Robinson
crobinso at redhat.com
Mon Nov 23 12:55:45 UTC 2009
On 11/22/2009 09:57 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Gerry Reno wrote:
>> Gerry Reno wrote:
>>> It finally finished the install and rebooted but now it appears that
>>> the guest is not booting. So need to investigate why it doesn't boot
>>> up. No console output at all after I start the guest. I dumped the
>>> xml and the boot dev is now "hd" and the path to the image is correct.
>>>
>>> -Gerry
>> Ok, I reran the install and got the exact same result. No bootup or
>> no console output at least.
>>
Just because you passed those kernel command line options in for install
doesn't mean they will stick for the life of the VM. You will need to find a
way to edit the grub.conf in the guest to get bootup output, and then
/etc/inittab to start a TTY on the serial line.
You'll either need to set up temporary graphical access, find the IP of the VM
and use ssh, or some way to kernel boot into rescue mode (or hack up your own
boot.iso to append custom kernel args).
>> Here is the process line:
>> root 23068 1 0 20:46 ? 00:00:02 /usr/bin/kvm -S -M
>> pc-0.11 -m 2048 -smp 4 -name DOMAIN-1 -uuid
>> b1620075-a0ba-1246-fd67-1243c20870a6 -nographic -monitor
>> unix:/var/run/libvirt/qemu/DOMAIN-1.monitor,server,nowait -boot c
>> -drive
>> file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/DOMAIN-1.img,if=ide,index=0,boot=on -net
>> nic,macaddr=54:52:00:4b:f1:a6,vlan=0,name=nic.0 -net
>> tap,fd=17,vlan=0,name=tap.0 -serial pty -parallel none -usb
>>
>> I see it has both -monitor and -serial. Does that make any difference?
>>
>> -Gerry
> I tried running the command directly and here is what it outputs:
> TUNGETIFF ioctl() failed: Bad file descriptor
> TUNSETOFFLOAD ioctl() failed: Bad file descriptor
> char device redirected to /dev/pts/1
>
You can't run the generated command directly because libvirtd sets up things
like tap devices before running the guest.
> I checked both the image file and the .monitor file and both are there
> and readable so I don't understand what file it is complaining about.
>
It's complaining about the tapfd, which isn't present because libvirt usually
takes care of it.
- Cole
More information about the virt-tools-list
mailing list