[virt-tools-list] Are requests for new virsh commands acceptable?

[dave bl]

On 22 August 2011 21:16, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:06:29PM +1000, dave bl wrote:
>> Are requests/patches for new virsh commands acceptable? ... I keep
>> typing in "boot" instead of "start", If I submit a patch to add
>> ('boot') this would anyone have anything against it?
>
> Certainly I've long wanted better aliases for virsh commands.
>
> This should be discussed on libvir-list.  I suggest sending patches
> there instead of here.

Right, I'll signed up to that list.

> There was some discussion about 4-8 months ago about this subject.  It
> might be a good idea to search the archives and familiarize yourself
> with that first.
>
> We can't remove the existing commands, and we should be careful about
> aliases which might clash with future commands.  Something to think
> about ...

Sounds good :)