[virt-tools-list] [PATCH 04/12] Add remote-viewer program

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 16:40:00 UTC 2012


On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:26:34AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:35:02PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > This program is meant for direct URI connections.
> > > ex: remote-viewer vnc://uri
> > > ---
> > >  .gitignore               |    3 +
> > >  po/POTFILES.in           |    2 +
> > >  src/Makefile.am          |  108 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  src/remote-viewer-main.c |  148
> > >  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  src/remote-viewer.c      |  141
> > >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  src/remote-viewer.h      |   56 +++++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> > Need to also change virt-viewer.spec.in & mingw32-virt-viewer.spec.in
> > to include the new binary
> >
> > > diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am
> > > index 4643de9..e1e0ee9 100644
> > > --- a/src/Makefile.am
> > > +++ b/src/Makefile.am
> > > @@ -1,57 +1,79 @@
> > > +NULL =
> > > +# we are forced to use a shared library,
> > > +# because libtool reordred .a after .la libs, and it fails to link
> > > +lib_LTLIBRARIES = libvirt-viewer.la
> >
> > The codebase is small enough that you could just list the sources
> > against both binaries. It'll compile them twice, but that's not
> > all that bad really, compared to having to install a shared lib
> 
> Note that the up to date branch is doing things differently, by using noinst_ for example.

Ok, a noinst_ lib is fine, since that ends up doing static linking anyway


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|




More information about the virt-tools-list mailing list