[virt-tools-list] [libosinfo 1/4] Add InstallScript:expected-path-format

[Christophe Fergeau]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:55:56PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Fergeau
> <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 08:14:55PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak at gnome.org>
> >>
> >> Inform the applications in which format the paths are expected by the
> >> installer.
> >> ---
> >>  data/install-scripts/windows-cmd.xml      |  2 +-
> >>  data/install-scripts/windows-reg.xml      |  2 +-
> >>  data/install-scripts/windows-sif.xml      |  2 +-
> >>  data/install-scripts/windows-unattend.xml |  4 ++--
> >>  osinfo/libosinfo.syms                     |  4 ++++
> >>  osinfo/osinfo_install_script.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  osinfo/osinfo_install_script.h            | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> >>  osinfo/osinfo_loader.c                    |  9 +++++++++
> >>  8 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.c b/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.c
> >> index 2292aac..2133618 100644
> >> --- a/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.c
> >> +++ b/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.c
> >> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ enum {
> >>      PROP_TEMPLATE_DATA,
> >>      PROP_PROFILE,
> >>      PROP_PRODUCT_KEY_FORMAT,
> >> +    PROP_EXPECTED_PATH_FORMAT,
> >
> > Not sure about the 'expected' part of the property name "path-format"
> > should be enough?
> 
> IMO its much more descriptive yet short enough. Also, its more
> consistent with the existing _get_expected_filename() method.

And is not consistent with the PROP_PRODUCT_KEY_FORMAT right above, I don't
really see what the 'expected' brings.

> >> +/**
> >> + * OsinfoPathFormat:
> >> + * OSINFO_PATH_FORMAT_UNIX: Unix/Linux path format, e.g /home/foo/bar.txt
> >> + * OSINFO_PATH_FORMAT_DOS: DOS/Windows path format, e.g \My Documents\bar.txt
> >
> > Shouldn't this have a drive name as well? C:\My Documents\bar.txt
> 
> As you'll see in the following patches, we'll have different params
> for disk/drive and path so that such API are as consistent as possible
> for different OSs.

Ah ok, might be worth explicitly spelling out that the drive name should
not be there as this is not your typical Windows path.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/attachments/20121112/87c44717/attachment.sig>