[virt-tools-list] Can we obsolete virt-convert, virt-clone, virt-image?
Jim Fehlig
jfehlig at suse.com
Tue Jan 14 02:07:39 UTC 2014
Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 04:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> virt-clone:
>>
>> This tool is supposed to clone existing images. But you can just run
>> dd/cp to clone the disks + 'virt-install --import' to create libvirt
>> configuration.
>>
>>
>
> Sure, but that's kind of like dismissing virt-install with 'you can just
> create the XML by hand and virsh define it.' The whole purpose of the tool is
> to simplify those steps.
>
>
>> To do full cloning you will really need something a lot more advanced
>> that can see inside the disks, ie. virt-sysprep, or that can sparsify
>> disks (virt-sysprep), or that can do templating (virt-builder et al).
>>
>> virt-clone is troublesome for me. Most people I meet who try to use
>> it should be using virt-sysprep.
>>
>>
>
> All this is ignoring the fact that there are people out there successfully
> using virt-clone/virt-manager clone, and that despite its limited nature, it
> suits their needs. When it breaks, people complain.
>
Nod. I've heard such complaints too.
> Is the tool terribly interesting or doing anything particularly difficult? Not
> at all. But it currently provides value. And really, if an end user just wants
> to clone a single VM for local test purposes (the common use case I've seen),
> telling them to use dd and virt-install --import isn't very friendly.
>
Agreed. Please don't drop this one. It would break a lot of tests
scripts, many of which I'm probably not aware of, but would hear about
from angry users in no time.
Regards,
Jim
More information about the virt-tools-list
mailing list