[virt-tools-list] [PATCH virt-viewer 0/2] Initial support for building with meson/ninja
Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
etrunko at redhat.com
Thu Oct 4 12:41:38 UTC 2018
On 10/4/18 7:48 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:07:57AM +0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>> The first patch is a preparation for the new build system. As it uses
>> a built in function provided by meson for generating the enum files, it
>> is not possible to run sed on the resulting file, so we need to keep it
>> as is.
>>
>> As for the build itself, the only missing features are windows related,
>> which I don't really know how to implement, but should not be difficult.
>
> IIUC, this series adds meson support, but leaves the autotools
> support unchanged.
>
Correct.
> I really don't like the idea of maintaining 2 build systems at
> the same time. It will inevitably lead to obscure bugs that depend
> on which build system is used. We've already suffered from this with
> GTK itself supporting both and their developers & CI only ever testing
> meson leading autotools to break.
>
In SPICE we added meson support as a "unofficial", because there are
still some unresolved issues in meson when it comes to distribution of
source tarballs with generated files. The plan is to switch by the
moment those are fixed.
> I'm a big fan of meson so I think we should simply do a straight
> switch. The main question is when, and that's largely determined
> by what platforms we care about.
>
>
It is easy enough to remove the autotools support, but I would first
make sure meson will cover all the use cases, especially things that are
done when autobuild.sh is run, and windows build, which this series
don't cover.
--
Eduardo de Barros Lima (Etrunko)
Software Engineer - RedHat
etrunko at redhat.com
More information about the virt-tools-list
mailing list